The conversation has always been the truest detector of mastery.
What if you could have a one-on-one conversation with every student in your class and drill down into what they actually know? What if you could do it in ten minutes or less? Now you can.
Provable Chat holds that conversation with every student at once, one Socratic dialogue each, in any of eight languages. Anyone can fake an essay in seconds, so Chat points the AI at the person instead of the assignment: the teacher sets the topic and what mastery looks like, and the AI keeps asking, never giving the answer, until the student can explain it in their own words or it is clear they cannot yet. Every conversation becomes data too, capturing how deeply a student reasoned rather than what they recalled, and showing exactly who has the idea, who is close, and who is not there yet. What you get back is proof of understanding that nothing on paper can fake, not even ChatGPT.
"What's happened? I've rethought what ai can do."· Student, early classroom useFor thousands of years, the academic conversation has been the measure of mastery.
Socrates tested his students by talking with them, not by reading what they wrote. Every doctorate still ends the same way: a live defense, nowhere to hide behind good writing. Provable brings that conversation into every classroom, at whatever rigor the teacher sets, from a quick check to a full defense. What you keep isn't a score. It's the conversation itself, the actual evidence a student understood, not a number standing in for it. Built by a classroom teacher and a college professor who know the difference.
If you're a teacher
Set a topic, give students a code, and by the end of class you know exactly who understood and who didn't, with the conversation to back it up.
If you run a school
You get evidence of learning you can show a parent, a board, or an authorizer, plus an AI guide on your website that helps families enroll.
If you're a student
No tricks and no gotchas. It's a conversation. If you can explain the idea in your own words, you're done, and it says so.
The Provable Platform
Four tools, one idea: understanding should be demonstrated, not assumed. Chat is the in-class conversation that verifies understanding before a grade goes in. Tutor teaches a topic and certifies it once the learner can explain it back. Desk talks with families on your website and helps them enroll. Insight puts all of it on one screen for whoever runs the building.
Tap each product to see what it does ↓
A Texas student carries roughly $10,000 a year in funding, and the families deciding where that student goes are on your website at 9pm with the questions that decide a switch: is it free, is there a bus, can a junior who gave up still graduate. Desk answers them the way your best front office would, captures the ones ready to enroll, and routes everyone else to the right person.
An essay can be generated. A worksheet can be copied. A live Socratic conversation where the AI pushes back until the student explains the idea in their own words cannot be faked by anyone, ChatGPT included. Watch a real session play out below. What the teacher gets back is the reasoning itself, gate by gate, in the student's own words.
Every exchange is logged. The teacher sees this result and the full transcript behind it.
Pick any topic. The AI never gives the answer. See if you can prove you understand it.
A learner works through the material in pieces whenever it suits them, explains it back to the AI when they are ready, and earns a certificate once the AI confirms they have really grasped it. You end up with proof they learned it, not proof they sat through it.
Pick any topic. The AI teaches it, then verifies you got it.
Everything those three record lands in a single view, so a principal or training lead can see who is demonstrating real understanding, who is only finishing the work, and who has gone quiet, alongside a summary they can copy and send.
Thirty-one families started enrollment conversations with our guide this month, and twelve left their information for the enrollment team to follow up. They asked most about transportation, tuition, and graduation.
In the classroom, 48 students demonstrated clear understanding of their coursework this week, up from 39 the week before. Three students are not yet showing progress and have been flagged for a check-in.
Enrollment and learning are both trending up heading into next month.
See it running on your own campus, free, in two weeks.
Anywhere understanding has to be demonstrated, not assumed.
"This is no gimmick in my opinion. It actually made me think instead of just look things up."
Student, early classroom use
"An AI tool that doesn't directly give you the answer. You have to work around and answer the questions. That's actually harder. And better."
Student, early classroom use
"You have a personal conversation with AI trying to make you understand the subject at your own pace. I've rethought what AI can do."
Student, early classroom use
Robert Jones, M.Ed.
Robert has taught for 14 years in Texas public schools. Today he teaches Economics and dual credit Psychology at Mesquite High School, along with courses for the School of Education at Dallas College, and he served two years as an instructional specialist supporting other teachers. He has taught middle school and secondary students, and led continuing education for adults training to become paraprofessionals. Before the classroom, he spent seven years as the national training director at a logistics software company, working in complex training environments across large organizations and Fortune 500 companies. In the classroom, he kept looking for a better way to prove a student understood something, one that didn't rely on a long essay or an AI checker. Provable is that better way. It proves understanding directly.
Robert leads a growing team behind Provable, and you'll meet the rest of them soon.
Don't take our word for it. Run the study on your campus.
Two weeks, one unit, a pre-quiz and a post-quiz. Provable runs alongside whatever you already teach. You keep the data whether or not you buy anything.
There's no one right way to run a session. Here's how teachers actually use it.
A Provable session is harder than a quiz, on purpose. That makes it strongest as a way to build and confirm understanding, not as a cold diagnostic before you've taught anything.
Teach the unit as normal, then run one session before the test. It's the last check that understanding is real before a grade goes in, the way the page describes it by default.
A short session right after each concept, instead of one big one at the end. Gaps get caught while there's still time in the unit to fix them, not after.
Give the test as usual. Students who don't meet the bar run a session before a retest or before the class moves on, so remediation means proving it, not just resubmitting.
Students join with a coded alias and the teacher keeps the key. Nothing in the database ties back to a real student.
Per campus, not per student.
Most tools charge per student, so the more it gets used, the more you pay. We charge per campus instead: one price, every student, roughly $3,000 to $9,000 a year by size. In Texas, a single enrollment Desk recovers carries roughly $10,000 a year in funding, so one family pays for the platform with room to spare. Districts are custom. Corporate pricing is per verified certificate, on its own page. No per-student fees, ever.
For comparison: Khanmigo charges $35 per student per year at the district level. A 1,000-student high school running Khanmigo pays $35,000 per year. Running Provable: $5,495.
The first session can run in your classroom tomorrow.
No accounts, no rostering, no IT project. Students join with a code, and by the bell you know exactly who understood, with the conversations to prove it.
"It actually made me think instead of just look things up." · Dual credit student